Is Obama being set up------or is he in on the game 

 

 

A hot new video came out today, called The Obama Deception

   

 

In this video they show the real powers behind Obama, that's calling all of the shots

  

 

In this video Henry Kissingers-----said that Obama would be the perfect person, to help them bring in the New World Order

 

 

To see this video, click on this LINK   http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KrpRocaEfQE    

To be  honest  i did not   look at  the video. Obama  is a socialist  and  thw New  World Order  is   right up his  alley.  Look  here is a man who  clearly  has lied on numerous  policies and what he would do if elelcted. Remember  he comes from the Saul  Alinsky  school  of community organizers.

If Obama try and bring in the New World Order-----do you think Black people, will swallow it. Hook, Line and Sinker

Realistically, the United States is in no postition to usher in any type of World Order regardless of who is in charge. As far as Obama is concerned, he's no socialist. He just very proactive about getting things done and it's alot for people to digest right now. I don't agree with everything that he wants done or is doing, but sometimes that's what leaders have to do (make unpopular decisions). I'm glad to see that he's making congress earn that pay though. It's about time that they start to become proactive about getting things done.

^^^I agree.  I am so sick of these hypocritical republicans playing the socialist card.  They should have known by now that crap didn't work during the campaign so why keep throwing the same old tired argument? 

---

Republican loves socialism, when it benefits them----What a bunch of repukes

^^I'm a republican who voted for Bush, McCain (primary) and Obama (general) and even I think that some in my party are being hypocrites.  Especially on the budget.   At least we have a massive deficit now for this country.  But, Obama needs to keep his dem majority Congress in check and he needs the line-item veto (reps gave it to Clinton, but dems took it from Bush).  I didn't go to that link.I can't wait for President Obama's first midterm election because I hope the pitiful/pork spending dems will lose their majority.  I'm sick of how partisan politics has become because I honestly believe that both dems and reps got us into these messes that rob from our great grandkids.

I doubt the dems will lose the majority. The reps are a hot mess right now. For one they will need to distance themselves from the likes of Rush Limbaugh and his ilk. Saying you hope the president fails is saying you want the country to fail. It's hard to see people voting for a party that wants the country to fail.

---

You can't change how you're percieved, just how you're presented
www.whyibetrippin.blogspot.com

 NoStereotyping wrote:^^I'm a republican who voted for Bush, McCain (primary) and Obama (general) and even I think that some in my party are being hypocrites.  Especially on the budget.   At least we have a massive deficit now for this country.  But, Obama needs to keep his dem majority Congress in check and he needs the line-item veto (reps gave it to Clinton, but dems took it from Bush).  I didn't go to that link.I can't wait for President Obama's first midterm election because I hope the pitiful/pork spending dems will lose their majority.  I'm sick of how partisan politics has become because I honestly believe that both dems and reps got us into these messes that rob from our great grandkids.

Sorry, but are you forgetting about the pitifull Republicans as well who voted in favor of those earmarks (Omninus bill)??  Tell me how can Obama keep Congress "in check"?  Yeah, I can't wait for midterm election too so those pititful no ideas, no solution Republicans who hate their country and want it to fail is voted out. 

---

Republican loves socialism, when it benefits them----What a bunch of repukes

All of us (republicans) don't want Obama and this country to fail.  I despise Rush "druggie" Limbaugh and fools like him that want our president to fail.   I voted for Obama and want him to succeed.My party's the minority and are outnumbered a lot by democrats, which leads me to believe that Dodd or Pelosi didn't try to keep earmarks out of it.  Which is why all presidents should have the line-item veto like Clinton had.  No wonder we had a surplus then.   I think that Obama might've been able to keep $millions or $billions out of the stimulus plan if he had the line-item veto and could veto pork/earmarks, but pass the needed bill. Until presidents have it or Congress isn't so corrupt, I don't see budgets getting balanced soon.